Neurol. praxi. 2010;11(3):191-194

Is migraine a progressive disease?

MUDr. Jiří Mastík
1 1. neurologická klinika LF MU a FN u sv. Anny, Brno

Introduction: The author aimed at evaluating the course of treatment in migraine patients and determining whether their migraine was

progressive.

Methods: A group of 72 patients with migraine without aura, migraine with aura, chronic migraine and analgesic- and ergotamine-overuse

headache was followed up retrospectively in the Regional Headache Centre in Brno for a mean period of 65 months. From October 1996

to July 2008, the following parameters were evaluated: the rate of attacks, severe pain intensity, degree of limitations in daily activities

and efficacy of treatment both at one year of treatment at the Centre and at present and these were compared to the baseline values.

Results: Improvement was achieved in 57.0 % of patients, 22.2 % deteriorated and 20.8 % were unchanged; the improvement was observed

as early as one year of treatment. There was a clear decrease in patients with a high intensity of migraine attacks and a severe degree

of limitations in daily activities. By contrast, the high frequency of pain remained unchanged and the number of patients with chronic

migraine decreased only slightly. There was a significant change in the profile of both acute and prophylactic antimigraine treatment.

Only 41.7 % of patients were familiar with triptans whereas now they are being used in almost 100 % and 88.7 % of patients are satisfied

with triptan treatment. Of concern was the finding that 26.4 % of our patients overused triptans. Initially, prophylaxis was used in only

55.6 % of the group; currently, it is used by 81.9 % of patients with topiramate being the most commonly used agent followed by valproates,

beta blockers and tricyclic antidepressants.

Conclusion: Our retrospective follow-up showed very decent results in migraine treatment with a balanced combination of acute and

prophylactic treatment and did not confirm the hypothesis that migraine must have a chronic-progressive course.

Keywords: migraine, acute treatment, triptans, overuse, prophylaxis

Published: June 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mastík J. Is migraine a progressive disease? Neurol. praxi. 2010;11(3):191-194.
Download citation

References

  1. Dolezil D, Mastik J, Kotas R, Novotna I. Efficacy of topiramate in prophylactic treatment of migraine: first open label, multicenter study in Czech Republic. XI Congress of the International Headache Society 2003, Roma. Abstract in Cephalalgia 2003; 7: 717.
  2. Ferrari MD, Roon KI, Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ. Oral triptans (serotonin 5-HT 1B/1D agonists) in acute migraine treatment: a metaanalysis of 53 trials. Lancet 2001; 358: 1668-1675. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, Ferrari MD. Migraine - current understanding and treatment. New Engl J Med 2002; 346: 257-270. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society: The International Classification and diagnostic kriteria of headache disorders. 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004; 24(1): 160.
  5. Mathew NT. Transformed migraine. Cephalalgia. 1993; 13(12): 78-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. McGregor A. Migraine in women. Martin Duniz, London 1999: 90. Go to original source...
  7. Olesen J, Lipton RB. Migraine classification and diagnosis. International Headache Society criteria. Neurology 1994; 44(Suppl 4): 6-10.
  8. Opavský J, Keller O, Kotas R, Mastík J, Marková J, Rejda J, Waberžinek G. Česká verze revidované mezinárodní klasifikace bolestí hlavy (ICHD - II) navržené a předložené Mezinárodní společností pro bolesti hlavy. Cesk Neurol Neurochir 2005; 68/101(2): 133-138.
  9. Silberstein SD, Neto W, Schmidt J, Jacobs D. MIGR-001 study group. Topiramate in migraine prevention. Results of a large controlled trial. Arch Neurol 2004; 61: 490-495. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.