Neurol. praxi. 2010;11(5):347-350

Diagnostics of lexical retrieval in patients with aphasia

doc.PaedDr.Zsolt Cséfalvay, PhD., Mgr.Martin Malík, PhD.
Katedra logopédie, PdF, Univerzita Komenského, Bratislava
I. neurologická klinika, Fakultná nemocnica s poliklinikou Bratislava, Staré mesto

The present study investigated the influence of context on word retrieval by individuals with aphasia. Twenty patients with aphasia

were presented with two different tasks, confrontation naming (naming of pictures) and spontaneous speech. Significant differences

between the tasks were found in favor of sponntaneous speech. It was concluded that spontaneous speech offers more ecologically

valid information about lexical retrieval in patients with aphasia than does confrontation naming and stresses also intervention

of contextual speech.

Keywords: aphasia, lexical retrieval, naming test, spontaneous speech

Published: December 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cséfalvay Z, Malík M. Diagnostics of lexical retrieval in patients with aphasia. Neurol. praxi. 2010;11(5):347-350.
Download citation

References

  1. Cséfalvay Zs, Maňásková K. Western Aphasia Battery. Slovenská experimentálna verzia testu. Nepublikované. Bratislava, 1988.
  2. Cséfalvay Zs, Košťálová M, Klimešová M. Diagnostika a terapie afázie, alexie a agrafie. Praha: AKL, 2003.
  3. Cséfalvay Zs, Egryová M, Wiedermann I. Diagnostika a terapia afázie, alexie a agrafie. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Kaminský, 2007.
  4. Druks J. Dvojitá disociácia podstatných mien a slovies. Logopaedica 2008; 11: 3-10.
  5. Herbert R, Hickin J, Howard D. Do picture naming tests provide a valid assessment of lexical retrieval in conversation in aphasia? Aphasiology 2007; 1(20): 134-145.
  6. Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1983.
  7. Košťálová M, et al. A standardization study of the Czech version of the Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test in stroke patients and control subjects. Brain Injury 2008; 22(10): 793-801. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Malík M, Cséfalvay Zs. Test pomenovania. Bratislava: Nepublikované, 2005.
  9. Malík M. Vplyv kontextu na lexikálne vyhľadávanie u pacientov s afáziou. Dizertačná práca. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2010.
  10. Marková J. Prejavy narušenia morfologicko-syntaktickej roviny v spontánnych rečových prejavoch u slovensky hovoriacich pacientov s afáziou. Rigorózna práca. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2000.
  11. Marková J. Vybrané kapitoly z aplikovanej lingvistiky a neurolingvistiky pre logopédov. Bratislava: LiečReh Gúth, 2006.
  12. Marková J. Terapia afázie - úroveň viet. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Komenského, 2008.
  13. Mayer JF, Murray LL. Functional measures of naming in aphasic word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech. Aphasiology 2003; 17(5): 481-497. Go to original source...
  14. Mätzig S, Druks J, Masterson J. Noun and verb differences in picture naming: Past studies and new evidence. Cortex 2009; 45: 738-758. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Mimrová M. Afázie jako logopedický fenomén. In: Kulišťák P, Lehečková H, Mimrová M, Nebudová J. Afázie. Praha: Triton, 1997: 23-124.
  16. Pashek GV, Tompkins CA. Context and word class influences on lexical retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology 2002; 16(3): 261-286. Go to original source...
  17. Wilshire CE, McCarthy RA. Evidence for a content sensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2002; 19(2): 165-186. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.