Neurol. pro Praxi, 2011; 12(Suppl.G)

Hodnotící škály používané u pacientů s cévní mozkovou příhodou

MUDr. Michal Reif
1. neurologická klinika LF MU a FN u sv. Anny, Brno

Published: December 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Reif M. Hodnotící škály používané u pacientů s cévní mozkovou příhodou. Neurol. praxi. 2011;12(Suppl. G: Škály používané v n.):.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adams HP Jr, Davis PH, Leira EC, Chang KC, Bendixen BH, Clarke WR, Woolson RF, Hansen MD. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology 1999; 53: 126-131. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Appelros P, Terent A. Characteristics of the National Institute of Health stroke scale: results from a population-based stroke cohort at baseline and after one year. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 17: 21-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Bruno A, Shah N, Lin C, Close B, Hess DC, Davis K, Baute V, Switzer JA, Waller JL, Nichols FT. Improving Modified Rankin Scale Assessment With a Simplified Questionnaire Stroke. 2010; 41: 00-00. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Brott TG, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864-870. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61-63. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Diringer MN. Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: a comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials. J Rehabil Res Dev 2003; 40: 1-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000; 31: 1429-1438. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health stroke scale: extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke 1997; 28: 307-310. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Karsner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 603-612. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Lai SM, Duncan PW. Stroke recovery profile and the modified Rankin assessment. Neuroepidemiology 2001; 20: 26-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. Stroke 1994; 25: 2220-2226. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Lyden P, Raman R, Liu L, Grotta J, Broderick J, Olson S, Shaw S, Spilker J, Meyer B, Emr M, Warren M, Marler J. NIHSS training and certification using a new digital video disk is reliable. Stroke 2005; 36: 2446-2449. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65. Go to original source...
    14. Meyer BC, Hemmen TM, Jackson CM, Lyden PD. Modified National Institutes of Health stroke scale for use in stroke clinical trials: prospective reliability and validity. Stroke 2002; 33: 1261-1266. Go to PubMed...
    15. Mikulik R, Ribo M, Hill MD, Grotta JC, Malkoff M, Molina C, Rubiera M, Delgado-Mederos R, Alvarez-Sabin J, Alexandrov AV, CLOTBUST Investigotors. Relative changes in serial NIHSS scores can serve as a simple clinical indicator of arterial status after intravenous thrombolysis. Circulation. 2007; 115: 2660-2665. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Newcommon NJ, Green TL, Haley E, et al. Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin scale. Stroke 2003; 34: 377-378. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Shinohara Y, Minematsu K, Amano T, Ohashi Y. Modified Rankin scale with expanded guidance scheme and interview questionnaire: interrater agreement and reproducibility of assessment. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 21: 271-278. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Sinoff G, Ore L. The Barthel activities of daily living index: selfreporting versus actual performance in the old-old (75 years). J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 832-836. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJA, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988; 19: 604-607. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Weimar C, König IR, Kraywinkel K, Ziegler A, Diener HC, German Stroke Study Collaboration. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score within 6 hours after onset are accurate predictors of outcome after cerebral ischemia Stroke. 2004; 35: 158-162. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content


    Neurology for Practice

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.