Neurol. praxi. 2012;13(5):279-282

The neuropsychiatric basis of placebo/nocebo phenomena

prof.MUDr.Peter Kukumberg, PhD.
II. neurologická klinika Lekárskej fakulty Univerzity Komenského a Univerzitnej nemocnice v Bratislave

Due to advances in imaging technology (PET, fMRI) and neuropsychopharmacological knowledge, there has been a shift in the understanding

of the ancient phenomena of "placebo and nocebo" from empirical to a more scientifically exact level with surprising findings.

Both the phenomena have neurotopically distributed territories, neurotransmitter coverage (particularly with the opioid, dopamine,

and cholecystokinin systems). The placebo effect may be inhibited by naloxone while the nocebo phenomenon by using proglumide.

The mechanisms accepted in these reactions are the processes of expectation (of a reward) as well as complicated Pavlov's principles

of conditioning. There still remain a number of unexplained or unresolved problems (e.g. responsiveness to these phenomena, nonstandard

nature and transience of their manifestations). The placebo/nocebo phenomena are most significantly involved in a range of

neuropsychiatric affections. The current state of knowledge confirms the irreplaceability of placebo use in objectification of the effect

of novel therapeutic molecules in a randomized double-blind trial. A dramatic increase in information in this field might even result in

the establishment of a separate subspeciality – "placebology".

of reward and conditioning, "placebology".

Keywords: placebo, nocebo, opioid system, dopamine, serotonin, cholecystokinin system, panic disorder, naloxone, proglumide, mechanisms

Published: November 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kukumberg P. The neuropsychiatric basis of placebo/nocebo phenomena. Neurol. praxi. 2012;13(5):279-282.
Download citation

References

  1. Benedetti F, Amanzio, M, Casadio C, Oliaro A, Maggi G. Blockade of nocebo hyperalgesia by the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide. Pain 1997; 71: 135-140. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Benedetti F, Pollo A, Lopiano L, Lanotte M, Vighetti S, Rainero I. Conscious excpectation and unconscious conditioning in analgetic, motor, and hormonal placebo/nocebo responses. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 4315-4323. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Benedetti F, Colloca L, Torre E. Placebo - responsive Parkinson patients show decreased activity in single neurons of subthalamicus nucleus. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 587-588. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Benedetti F, Mayberg SH, Wager DT, Stohler SCh, Zubieta K. Neurobiological Mechanisms of the Placebo Effect. The Journal Neurosciences 2005; 25(45): 10390-10402. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Bendsten L, Mattson P, Zwart JA, Lipton RB. Placebo response in clinical randomized trials of analgesics in migraine. Cephalalgia 2003; 23: 487-490. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bradwejn J, Koszycki D, Tetre CA. Effects of flunazemil on cholecystokinin - tetrapeptide - induced panic symptoms in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 1994; 114: 257-261. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Burneo JG, Montori VM, Faught E. Magnitude of the placebo effect in randomized trials of antiepileptic agents. Epilepsy Behav 2002; 3: 532-534. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Cavanna EA, Strigaro G, Monaco F. Brain mechanisms underlying the placebo effects in neurological disorders. Functional Neurology 2007; 2(22): 89-94.
  9. Colloca L, Benedetti F. Nocebo hyperalgesia: how anxiety is turned into pain. Current Opinion in Anaestesiology 2007; 5(20): 435-439. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Diederich JN, Goetz GCh. The placebo treatment in neurosciences: New insights from clinical and neuroimaging studies. Neurology 2008; 71: 677-684. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Enck P, Benedetti F, Schedlowski M. New Insights into the Placebo and Nocebo Responses. Neuron 2008; 59: 195-206. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Fernandez de la R, Ruth JT, Sossi V, Schulzer M, Calme BD, Stoessl JA. Expectation and dopamine release: mechanism of the placebo effect in Parkinson´s disease. Science 2001; 293: 1164-1166. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Finniss GD, Kaptchuck JT, Miller F, Benedetti F. Placebo Effects: Biological, Clinical and Ethical Advances. Lancet 2010; 375: 686-695. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Fulda S, Wetter CT. Where dopamine meets opiods: a meta-analysis of the placebo effect in RLS treatment studies. Brain 2007; 10: 1-16.
  15. Kong I, Gollub LR, Polich G, Kirsch I, LaViolette P, Vangel M, Rosen B, Kaptchuk JT. A Funcional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Neural Mechanisms of Hyperalgesic Nocebo Effect. Journal of Neurosciencie 2008; 28(49): 13354-13362. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Krsiak M. Is placebo effective? If yes, what this could mean? Act Nerv Super Rediviva 2009; 1-2(51): 5-8.
  17. Kukumberg P. Panická porucha - neuropsychiatrický profil (minimonografia). Česk Slov Neurol N 2007; 70/103(1): 6-15.
  18. Levine JD, Gordon NC, Fields HL. The mechanism of placebo analgesia. Lancet 1978; 2: 654-657. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Leuchter AF, Cook IA, Witte EA, Morgan M, Abrams M. Changes in brain function of depressed subjects during treatment with placebo. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 122-129. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Mitsikoostas DD, Mantonakis, Chairakis GN. Nocebo is the enemy, not placebo. A meta-analyses of reported side effects after placebo treatment in headaches. Cephalalagia 2011; 5(31): 550-561. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Motlová L, Koukolík F. Citový mozek. Neurobiologie, klinický obraz, terapie. Galen Praha 2006: 359.
  22. Papadopoulos D. Nocebo Effects in multiple sclerosis trials: a meta-analyses. Mult Scler 2010; 7(16): 816-828. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Petrovic P, Dietrich T, Fransson P, Andersson J, Carlssen K, Ingvar M. Placebo in Emotional Processing Induced Expectations of Anxiety Relief Activate a Generalized Modulatory Network. Neuron 2005; 46: 957-969. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Scott JD, Stohler SCh, Egnatuk MCh, Wang H, Koeppe AR, Zubieta KJ. Individual Differences in Reward responding Explain Placebo-Induced Expectations and Effects. Neuron 2007; 55: 325-336. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Scott JD, Stohler SCh, Egnatuk MCh, Wang H, Koeppe AR, Zubieta KJ. Placebo and Nocebo Effects Are Defined by Opposite Opioid and Dopaminergic Responses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 2(65): 220-231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Schweinhardt P, Semminowicz AD, Jaeger E, Duncan HG, Bushnell CM. The Anatomy of the Mesolimbic Reward System: A Link between Personality and the Placebo Analgesic Response. J Neurosci 2009; 29(50): 4882-4887. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Teixera ZM, Guedes FFHC, Barreto VP, Martins AM. The placebo effect and homeopathy. Homeopathy 2010; 99: 119-129. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.