Neurol. praxi. 2015;16(1):34-37

Lumbar spinal stenosis - surgery or conservative treatment?

MUDr. Blanka Adamová, Ph.D.1,2, MUDr. Stanislav Voháňka, CSc.1,2
1 Neurologická klinika LF MU a FN Brno
2 CEITEC &ndash, Středoevropský technologický institut MU, Brno

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is considered a slowly progressive disease with long-term clinical stability. However, its natural course remains largely unknown. Two therapeutic options present themselves – conservative treatment or surgical treatment. At the current time, there is no general agreement about approaches to LSS therapy. This article summarizes the pros and cons the two therapeutic methods and presents certain outcome predictors; the authors also draw up recommendations that may assist choice of optimal therapy for patients with LSS.

Keywords: lumbar spinal stenosis, neurogenic claudication, surgery, prognosis

Published: January 26, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Adamová B, Voháňka S. Lumbar spinal stenosis - surgery or conservative treatment? Neurol. praxi. 2015;16(1):34-37.
Download citation

References

  1. Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F, Herno A, Alen M, Salmi L, Kröger H, Andrade J, Jiménez R, Tapaninaho A, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O. Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine 2006; 31(18): E648-663. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L, Jarkovsky J, Chaloupka R, Bednarik J. Outcomes and their predictors in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 12-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 2014. DOI 10.1007/s00586-014-3411-y. Go to original source...
  3. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 2000; 25(11): 1424-1435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Athiviraham A, Wali ZA, Yen D. Predictive factors influencing clinical outcome with operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 2011; 11: 613-617. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB, Chapin AM, Patrick DL, Long JM, Singer DE. The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1996; 21(15): 1787-1794. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Surgical and non surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 2000; 25(5): 556-562. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 2005; 30(8): 936-943. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Benoist M. The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis. Joint Bone Spine 2002; 69: 450-457. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Epstein NE, Maldonado VC, Cusick JF. Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Surg Neurol 1998; 50(1): 3-10.
  10. Gibson JNA, Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Published Online: 8 OCT 2008, The Cochrane Library. Dostupné z http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001352.pub3/pdf/abstract.
  11. Hurri H, Slätis P, Soini J, Tallroth K, Alaranta H, Laine T, Heliövaara M. Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of long-term outcome 12 years after operative and conservative treatment. J Spinal Disord 1998; 11: 110-115. Go to original source...
  12. Jayson MIV. Pharmacologic Treatment. In: Gunzburg R, Szpalski M (eds). Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2000: 165-168.
  13. Johnsson KE, Uden A, Rosen I. The effect of decompression on the natural course of spinal stenosis. A comparison of surgically treated and untreated patients. Spine 1991; 16(6): 615-619. Go to original source...
  14. Johnsson KE, Rosen I, Uden A. The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; 279: 82-86. Go to original source...
  15. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Brick GW, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN, Fossel AH, Lew RA, Liang MH. Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1995; 20(10): 1155-1160. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kovacs FM, Urrútia G, Alarcón JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine 2011; 36: E1335-1351. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, Dalin-Hirvonen N, Seitsalo S, Herno A, Kortekangas P, Niinimäki T, Rönty H, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Härkänen T, Hurri H; Finnish Lumbar Spinal Research Group. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2007; 32(1): 1-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Mičánková Adamová B, Hnojčíková M, Voháňka S, Dušek L. Oswestry dotazník, verze 2.1a - výsledky u pacientů s lumbální spinální stenózou, srovnání se starší verzí dotazníku. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2012; 75/108(4): 460-467.
  19. Mičánková Adamová B, Bednařík J. Lumbální spinální stenóza - poddiagnostikované onemocnění vyššího věku. Med. praxi 2012; 9(11): 456-458.
  20. Micankova Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L, Jarkovsky J, Bednarik J. Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2012; 21(12): 2611-2619. Go to original source...
  21. Mičánková Adamová B, Voháňka S. Kvantifikace postižení u pacientů s lumbální spinální stenózou. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2013; 76/109(5): 570-574.
  22. North American Spine Society (NASS). Evidence Based Clinical Guidelines for Multidisciplinary Spine Care: Diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (revised 2011). Dostupné z URL: https://www.spine.org/Documents/ResearchClinicalCare/Guidelines/LumbarStenosis.pdf
  23. Pearson A, Lurie J, Tosteson T, Zhao W, Abdu W, Weinstein JN. Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT. Spine 2012; 37: 1791-1802. Go to original source...
  24. Postacchini F. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78(1): 154-164. Go to original source...
  25. Siebert E, Prüss H, Klingebiel R, Failli V, Einhäupl KM, Schwab JM. Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 2009; 5: 392-403. Go to original source...
  26. Sigmundsson FG, Kang XP, Jönsson B, Strömqvist B. Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. Acta Orthop 2012; 83: 536-542. Go to original source...
  27. Simotas AC, Dorey FJ, Hansraj KK, Cammisa F Jr. Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine 2000; 25: 197-203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Slätis P, Malmivaara A, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Herno A, Kankare J, Seitsalo S, Tallroth K, Turunen V, Knekt P, Hurri H. Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 2011; 20(7): 1174-1181. Go to original source...
  29. Voháňka S, Mičánková Adamová B. Lumbální spinální stenóza a neurogenní klaudikace. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2009; 72/105(5): 405-417.
  30. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H; SPORT Investigators. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358(8): 794-810. Go to original source...
  31. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson A, Blood E, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine 2010; 35(14): 1329-1338. Go to original source...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.