Neurol. praxi. 2015;16(1):54-57

Reaction time proper. Unilateral tumour of the frontal lobe-does it affect the reaction time?

prof. MUDr. Lubor Stejskal, DrSc., MUDr. Svatopluk Ostrý, Ph.D., MUDr. RNDr. Ondřej Bradáč
Neurochirurgická klinika 1. LF UK, ÚVN a IPVZ Praha

In 51 patients with unilateral involvement of the anterior frontal cortex, the reaction time of hand movement to a somesthetic stimulus was assessed. The actual reaction time (the reaction time left after subtracting the time taken for a stimulus to reach the brain and the time of brain output to muscle) is independent of the site, size, and tissue composition of a frontal lobe tumour of the cerebrum. Extensive gliomas of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and those of the orbitofrontal cortex, large convexity meningiomas, and parasagittal meningiomas failed to cause a significant disturbance in the reaction time. The actual reaction time in unilateral frontal lobe tumours of the cerebrum is not laterally different. In 87% of those investigated, it ranged from 110 to 260 ms. The actual reaction time, corresponding to the time taken to process a decision to move and to produce a movement pattern, is provided by the neuronal system resistant to focal involvement of the anterior frontal cortex. This finding is an important clue for surgeries in the premotor area.

Keywords: reaction time, preparation of movement to an external stimulus, frontal lobe tumours

Published: January 26, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Stejskal L, Ostrý S, Bradáč O. Reaction time proper. Unilateral tumour of the frontal lobe-does it affect the reaction time? Neurol. praxi. 2015;16(1):54-57.
Download citation

LMm_References

  1. Asanuma H. The Motor Cortex. Raven Press, New York 1989.
  2. Balleine BW, Delgado MR, Hikosaka O. The role of the dorsal striatum in reward and decision-making. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 8161-8165. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Barbey AK, Krueger F, Grafman J. Structured event complexes in the medial prefrontal cortex support counterfactual representations for future planning. Phil Trans R Soc B 2009; 364: 1291-1300. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bareš M, Rektor I. Basal ganglia involvement in sensory and cognitive processing. A depth electrode CNV study in human sjubjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 2022-2030. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Deuschl G, Eisen A. Long latency reflexes following electrical nerve stimulation. In: Recommendations for the practice of clinical neurophysiology: guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1999; (Suppl. 52): 268.
  6. Favorov O, Sakamoto T, Asanuma H. Functional role of cortico-peripheral loop circuits during voluntary movements in the monkey: a preferential bias theory. J Neurosci 1988; 8: 3266-3277. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Frith CD, et al. Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET. Proc Roy Soc London 1991; B244: 241-246. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Gold JI, Shadlen MN. The neuronal basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 2007; 30: 535-574. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Hanes DP, Schall JD. Neural kontrol of voluntary movement initiation. Science 1996; 274: 427-430. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kadaňka Z, Pukl Z, Bednařík J. Evokované motorické potenciály v diagnóze roztroušené sklerózy. Cesk Neurol Neurochir 1990; 53/6: 369-379. Go to PubMed...
  11. Kennerley SW, Wallis JD. Reward-dependent modulation of working memory in lateral prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci 2009; 29: 3259-3270. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Kornhuber HH, Deecke L. Hirnpotentialaenderungen bei Wuellkurbewegungen und passive Bewegungen des Menschen Bereitschaftpotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflueg Arch 1965; 284: 1-17. Go to original source...
  13. Lau B, Glimcher PW. Action and outcome encoding in the primate caudate nucleus. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 14502-14514. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Lee D, Seo H. Mechanisms of reinforcement learning and decision making in the primate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007, Ref. Midline. Go to original source...
  15. Libet B, Wright Jr EW, Glearson CA. Preparation - or intention-to-act, in relation to pre-event potentials recorded at the verte. Electroencephalography Clin Neuropysiol 1983; 56: 367-372. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Marsden CD. The mysterious motor function of the basal ganglia. Neurology 1982; 32: 514-539. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Miller EK. The prefrontal cortex and cognitive kontrol. Nature Rev Neurosci 2000; 1: 59-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Pardo-Vazquez JL, Leboran V, Acuna C. Neural correlates of decisions and their outcomes in the ventral premotor cortex. JNeurosci 2008; 19: 12396-12408. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Petrides M. The role of the mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in working memory. Exp Brain Res 2000; 133: 44-54. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Pruszynski JA, Kurtzer I, Scott SH. The long-latency reflex is composed of at least two functionally independent processes. J Neurophysiol 2011; 106: 449-459. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Rektor I, Bareš M, Kaňovský P, Brázdil M, Klejblová I, Streitová H, Rektorová I, Sochůrková D, Kubová D, Kuba R, Daniel P. Cognitive potentials in the basal ganglia-frontocortical circuits. An intracerebral recording study. Exp Brain Res 2004, 158: 289-301. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Rektor I, Bareš M, Kubová D. Movement-related potentials in the basal ganglia: a SEEG readiness potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 2146-2153. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Romo R, Hernández A, Zainos A. Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision in ventral premotor cortex. Neuron 2004; 41: 165-173. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Samejima K, Ueda Y, Doya K, Kimura M. Representation of action-specific reward values in the striatum. Science 2006; 310: 1337-1340. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Seo H, Barraclough DJ, Lee D. Dynamic signals related to choices and outcomes in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17(Suppl 1): 110-117. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Schaltenbrand G, Bailey P. Atlas of the Human Brain. Thieme, Stuttgart, 1959.
  27. Schell GR, Strick PL. Origin of thalamic input to the SMA and arcuate premotor areas. J. Neurosci. 1984; 4: 539-560. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Stejskal L, Lébl M, Holiš M, Lopuchovský S, Přibáň V, Tolar R. Korový somatosenzorický evokovaný potenciál n. medianus dospělého člověka. Čs Neurol Neurochir 1983; 46/79: 366-374.
  29. Straus J, Danko F. Reakční čas na náhodný podnět vyžadující komplexní motorickou odezvu. Locomotor Systém 2009; 16: 52-63.
  30. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-Planar Stereotactic Atlas of the Human Brain. Thieme Medical Publisher, New York, 1988.
  31. Tanji J, Hoshi E. Role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in executive behavioral control. Physiol Rev 2008; 88: 37-57. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Xiao-Jing Wang. Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits. Neuron 2002; 36: 955-968. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.