Neurol. praxi. 2016;17(5):315-319 | DOI: 10.36290/neu.2016.065

Possibility of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly

MUDr. Michael Mrůzek, MUDr. Tomáš Paleček, Ph.D., doc. MUDr. Radim Lipina, Ph.D.
Neurochirurgická klinika FN Ostrava

The autors evaluate the results of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis in patiens over 65 years of age. The group included 72 patients, of whom 31 women and 41 men, the average age of 69.7 years. Type of Surgery has always chosen so that the patient is burdened as little as possible postoperative complications and allow for rapid vertikalization. From the surgical techniques were performed laminectomy with or without instrumentation, simple decompres-sion or indirect decompression through the introduction of an interspinous implant. Patients were followed for 5 years. It was evaluated ODI, VAS and ODOM score and claudication interval prolongation.

Keywords: elderly patient, lumbar spinal stenosis, surgical treatment

Published: November 7, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mrůzek M, Paleček T, Lipina R. Possibility of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly. Neurol. praxi. 2016;17(5):315-319. doi: 10.36290/neu.2016.065.
Download citation

References

  1. Adamová B, Voháňka S, Dušek L. Differential diagnostics in patients with mild lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2003: 192-195. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordac HJ, Nordal HJ, Magnaes B, Abdelnoor M, Lilleas F. Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgi-cal management. Spine 2000; 23: 1023-1066. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Andersson GBJ, McNeill TW. Lumbar spine syndromes. Evaluation and treatment. First edition, Wien-New York: Springer Verlag, 1989: 305-308. Go to original source...
  4. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long term outcomes of surgical and non surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8-10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 2005; 30: 938-942. Go to original source...
  5. Barbagallo GM, Olindo G, Corbino L, Albanese V. Ananlysis of complication in patients treated with the X STOP interspinous proces decompresion systém: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring systém for patient selection and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2009; 65(11): 111-120. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine 2000; 25: 2940-2952. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Grob D, Humke T, Dvorak J. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without artrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(7): 1036-1041. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Gunzburg R, Szpalski M. The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly. Eur Spine J 2003; 12(Suppl): S176-S180. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Hrabálek L, Novotný J, Koluchová J, Vaverka M, Kalita O, Langová K. Změny parametrů páteře po implantaci bederní interspinósní rozpěrky DIAM. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2009; 72/105(4): 337-342.
  10. Hrabálek L, Wanek T, Adamus M. Léčba juxtafacetárních cyst bederní páteře perkutánní dynamickou interspinósní stabilizací: prospektivní studie. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2012; 6: 144-149. Go to original source...
  11. Janson KA, Blomquist P, Granath F, Nemezh G. Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden. Eur Spine J 2003; 12: 535-541. Go to original source...
  12. Kovacs FM, Urrútia G, Alarcón JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for sympto-matic lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2011; 36(20): 1335-1348. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Mičánková B, Bednařík J, Chaloupka R, Mechl M, Ryba L, Voháňka S. Lumbální spinální stenóza. Galén 2012: 78-88.
  14. Morgalla MH, Noak N, Merkle M, Tatagiba MS. Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients:is a unilateral approach sufficient for decompression? J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 14: 305-312. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Munting, Munting E. Low back pain is not an indication for stabilisation in patientes operated for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2002; 23(1): 1222-1224.
  16. Náhlovský J. Neurochirurgie. 1. vydání Praha, Grada, 2006: 368-369.
  17. Popov V, Anderson DG. Minimal invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Advances in Orthopedics 2012; 4: 2-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Porter RW. Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine 1997; 22: 2048-2050.
  19. Porter RW. Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine 1996; 21: 2046-2052. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, Beaupré GS, Yerby SA. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous proces implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine 2005; 30(7): 744-749. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment strategies and indicati-ons for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 2003; 34(2): 281-295. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Siddiqui M, Karadimas E, Nicol, Smith FW, Wardlaw D. Influence of X stop on neural foramina and spinal canal area in spinal stenosis. Spine 2006; 31(25): 2958-2962. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Tenhula J, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Gupta P, Riew KD, Blanke K. Prospective functional evaluation of the surgical treatment of neurogenic claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 2000; 13(4): 76-280. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bazner H, Pockler-Schoniger C, Wohrle J, Schmiedek P. Outcome after less invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparsion of unilateral laminotomy, billateral la-minotomy and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3(2): 130-140. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumar spinal stenosis. Spine 1992; 17(1): 1-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Voháňka S, Adamová B, Bednařík J. Lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation between radiological and electrophysiological data. J Neurol 2001; 248(Suppl.2): 101-103.




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.