Neurol. praxi. 2020;21(4):277-282 | DOI: 10.36290/neu.2020.093

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring - Evoked potentials and Electromyography

MUDr. Svatopluk Ostrý, Ph.D.
Neurologické oddělení Nemocnice České Budějovice, a. s., České Budějovice

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is aimed at reducing risk of poostoperative neurological deficit in particular group of surgical procedures. There is much similar with evoked potentials (EP) examination routinely performed in labs. There are two main differences between EPs in lab and IONM, invasive versus noninvasive stimulation and/or registration and evaluation changes of responses in time during surgery instead of comparison to normative values. Pure EP parameters has to be compared not only with the baseline values but also with clinical picture, actual situation at the operation room and in the operation field. Thorough neurophysiological knowledge and skills is obligatory for appropriate assignment of EP changes and clinical outcome. Aim of this work is general introduction, indications, advantages and limitations of intraoperative neurophysiological techniques, We tried to show optimal IONM usage to gain safety of the surgery and concurrently what practice should be avoided.

Keywords: intraoperative monitoring, intraoperative mapping, evoked potentials, electromyography, warning criteria.

Published: September 8, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ostrý S. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring - Evoked potentials and Electromyography. Neurol. praxi. 2020;21(4):277-282. doi: 10.36290/neu.2020.093.
Download citation

References

  1. Florence G, Guerit JM, Gueguen B. Electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) to prevent cerebral ischaemia in the operating room. Neurophysiol Clin 2004; 34(1): 17-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Kothbauer KF. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring for intramedullary spinal-cord tumor surgery. Neurophysiol Clin 2007; 37(6): 407-414. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Lall RR, Lall RR, Hauptman JS, Munoz C, Cybulski GR, Koski T, Ganju A, Fessler RG, Smith ZA. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33(5): E10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Legatt AD, Emerson RG, Epstein CM, MacDonald DB, Deletis V, Bravo RJ, Lopez JR. ACNS Guideline: Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 33(1): 42-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. MacDonald DB. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update. J Clin Monit Comput 2006; 20(5): 347-377. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. MacDonald DB, Skinner S, Shils J, Yingling C. American Society of Neurophysiological, M. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol 2013; 124(12): 2291-2316. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Neu M, Strauss C, Romstock J, Bischoff B, Fahlbusch R. The prognostic value of intraoperative BAEP patterns in acoustic neurinoma surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 110(11): 1935-1941. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Ostrý S. Spinální neurologie. Praha, Maxdorf. 2019: 133-140.
  9. Ostry S, Belsan T, Otahal J, Benes V, Netuka, D. Is intraoperative diffusion tensor imaging at 3.0T comparable to subcortical corticospinal tract mapping? Neurosurgery 2013; 73(5): 797-807; discussion 806-797. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Ostrý S, Stejskal L. Evokované odpovědi a elektromyografie v intraoperační monitoraci v neurochirurgii. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2010; 73/106(1): 8-19.
  11. Prell J, Rampp S, Romstock J, Fahlbusch R, Strauss C. Train time as a quantitative electromyographic parameter for facial nerve function in patients undergoing surgery for vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg 2007; 106(5): 826-832. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Raabe A, Beck J, Schucht, P, Seidel K. Continuous dynamic mapping of the corticospinal tract during surgery of motor eloquent brain tumors: evaluation of a new method. J Neurosurg 2014; 120(5): 1015-1024. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Rampp S, Rachinger J, Scheller C, Alfieri A, Strauss C, Prell J. How many electromyography channels do we need for facial nerve monitoring? J Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 29(3): 226-229. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Romstock J, Strauss C, Fahlbusch R. Continuous electromyography monitoring of motor cranial nerves during cerebellopontine angle surgery. J Neurosurg 2000; 93(4): 586-593. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Seidel K, Beck J, Stieglitz L, Schucht P, Raabe A. Low-threshold monopolar motor mapping for resection of primary motor cortex tumors. Neurosurgery 2012; 71(Suppl. 1 Operative): 104-114; discussion 114-105. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Sobottka SB, Schackert G, May SA, Wiegleb M, Reiss G. Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IFNM) predicts facial nerve outcome after resection of vestibular schwannoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998; 140(3): 235-242; discussion 242-233. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Stejskal L, Kramar F, Ostry S, Benes V, Mohapl M, Limberk B. Experience of 500 cases of neurophysiological monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2007; 149(7): 681-688; discussion 689. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Stejskal L, Ostrý S, Kramář F, Tomáš R, Čelakovský, P. Intraoperační stimulační monitorace v neurochirurgii. Praha, Grada Publishing 2006: 112.
  19. Stejskal L, Štětkářová I, Ostrý S. Poznámky k "frontálnímu somatosenzorickému generátoru". Předmluva k článku "Evidence for perirolandic generators of median nerve SEPs from differential scalp recording". Cesk Slov Neurol N 2004; 67/100(1): 24-28.
  20. Sutter M, Eggspuehler A, Jeszenszky D, Kleinstueck F, Fekete TF, Haschtmann D, Porchet F, Dvorak J. The impact and value of uni- and multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) on neurological complications during spine surgery: a prospective study of 2728 patients. Eur Spine J 2019; 28(3): 599-610. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Szelenyi A, Hattingen E, Weidauer S, Seifert V, Ziemann U. Intraoperative motor evoked potential alteration in intracranial tumor surgery and its relation to signal alteration in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 2010; 67(2): 302-313. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Szelenyi A, Langer D, Beck J, Raabe A, Flamm ES, Seifert V, Deletis V. Transcranial and direct cortical stimulation for motor evoked potential monitoring in intracerebral aneurysm surgery. Neurophysiol Clin 2007; 37(6): 391-398. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J. Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 1993; 32(2): 219-226. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Tonn JC, Schlake HP, Goldbrunner R, Milewski C, Helms, J, Roosen K. Acoustic neuroma surgery as an interdisciplinary approach: a neurosurgical series of 508 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69(2): 161-166. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.