Neurol. praxi. 2022;23(3):E1-E11 | DOI: 10.36290/neu.2022.017

EEG in non-convulsive status epilepticus

MUDr. Hana Krijtová, MUDr. David Krýsl, Ph.D., prof. MUDr Petr Marusič, Ph.D.
Neurologická klinika 2. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha

EEG is essential for diagnosis of non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Two compatible diagnostic systems have been developed for this purpose during last 15 years. The Salzburg Consensus Criteria for Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus define unequivocal EEG patterns that confirm NCSE but also patterns that may or may not represent NCSE (i. e. "possible NCSE"). The Salzburg Criteria adopt the rigorous definitions of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology (ACNS-SCCET), which, in turn, became the main tool for description of EEG in all patients suspected to suffer from NCSE. Its latest 2021 version contains new propositions for the definitions of epileptic seizures and status epilepticus that are compatible with Salzburg Criteria, as well as a proposition for the definition of "ictal-interictal continuum", which is synonymous with "possible NCSE".

Keywords: seizures, epilepsy, status epilepticus, electroencephalography, diagnosis, ictal-interictal continuum.

Received: March 20, 2022; Revised: March 20, 2022; Accepted: March 26, 2022; Prepublished online: March 26, 2022; Published: June 16, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krijtová H, Krýsl D, Marusič P. EEG in non-convulsive status epilepticus. Neurol. praxi. 2022;23(3):E1-11. doi: 10.36290/neu.2022.017.

Download citation

References

  1. Beniczky S, Aurlien H, Brøgger JC, et al. Standardized computer-based organized reporting of EEG: SCORE. Epilepsia. 2013;54(6):1112-1124. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Beniczky S, Aurlien H, Brøgger JC, et al. Standardized computer-based organized reporting of EEG: SCORE - Second version. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(11):2334-2346. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Beniczky S, Hirsch LJ, Kaplan PW, et al. Unified EEG terminology and criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2013;54(Suppl 6):28-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP, et al. Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part II: personnel, technical specifications, and clinical practice. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;32(2):96-108. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Hirsch LJ, LaRoche SM, Gaspard N, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2012 version. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;30(1):1-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Chong DJ, Hirsch LJ. Which EEG patterns warrant treatment in the critically ill? Reviewing the evidence for treatment of periodic epileptiform discharges and related patterns. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;22(2):79-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cormier J, Maciel CB, Gilmore EJ. Ictal-Interictal Continuum: When to WorryAbout the Continuous Electroencephalography Pattern. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;38(6):793-806. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607987. Epub 2017 Dec 20. PMID: 29262437. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Kapinos G, Trinka E, Kaplan PW. Multimodal Approach to Decision to Treat Critically Ill Patients With Periodic or Rhythmic Patterns Using an Ictal-Interictal Continuum Spectral Severity Score. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;35(4):314-324. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Kaplan PW. EEG criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2007;48(Suppl 8):39-41. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Leitinger M, Beniczky S, Rohracher A, et al. Salzburg Consensus Criteria for Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus - approach to clinical application. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;49:158-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Leitinger M, Trinka E, Gardella E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Salzburg EEG criteria for non-convulsive status epilepticus: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(10):1054-1062. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Limotai C, Ingsathit A, Thadanipon K, et al. How and Whom to Monitor for Seizures in an ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(4):e366-e373. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Newey CR, Sahota P, Hantus S. Electrographic Features of Lateralized Periodic Discharges Stratify Risk in the Interictal-Ictal Continuum. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34(4):365-369. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Othman AS, Meletti S, Giovannini G. The EEG diagnosis of NCSE: Concordance between clinical practice and Salzburg Criteria for NCSE. Seizure. 2020;79:1-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Punia V, Garcia CG, Hantus S. Incidence of recurrent seizures following hospital discharge in patients with LPDs (PLEDs) and nonconvulsive seizures recorded on continuous EEG in the critical care setting. Epilepsy Behav. 2015; 49:250-254. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Rodriguez Ruiz A, Vlachy J, Lee JW, et al. Association of Periodic and Rhythmic Electroencephalographic Patterns With Seizures in Critically Ill Patients. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(2):181-188. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Sivaraju A and Gilmore EJ. Understanding and Managing the Ictal-Interictal Continuum in Neurocritical Care. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2016;18(2):8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Sinha SR, Sullivan LR, Sabau D, et al. American clinical neurophysiology society guideline 1: minimum technical requirements for performing clinical electroencephalography. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;33:303-307. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Struck AF, Osman G, Rampal N, Biswal S, Legros B, Hirsch LJ, Westover MB and Gaspard N. Time-dependent risk of seizures in critically ill patients on continuous electroencephalogram. Ann Neurol. 2017;82(2):177-185. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Struck AF, Ustun B, Ruiz AR, et al. Association of an Electroencephalography-Based Risk Score With Seizure Probability in Hospitalized Patients. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(12):1419-1424. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Struck AF, Westover MB, Hall LT, et al. Metabolic Correlates of the Ictal-Interictal Continuum: FDG-PET During Continuous EEG. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24(3):324-331. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Trinka E, Cock H, Hesdorffer D, et al. A definition and classification of status epilepticus - Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2015;56(10):1515-1523. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Yoo JY, Marcuse LV, Fields MC, et al. Brief Potentially Ictal Rhythmic Discharges [B(I)RDs] in Noncritically Ill Adults. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34(3):222-229. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Yoo JY, Rampal N, Petroff OA, et al. Brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges in critically ill adults. JAMA Neurol. 2014; 71(4):454-462. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Young GB, Jordan KG, Doig GS. An assessment of nonconvulsive seizures in the intensive care unit using continuous EEG monitoring: an investigation of variables associated with mortality. Neurology. 1996;47(1):83-89. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Young GB, Sharpe MD, Savard M, et al. Seizure detection with a commercially available bedside EEG monitor and the subhairline montage. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(3):411-416. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.