Neurol. praxi. 2012;13(4):219-220

Migraine or epilepsy - an outpatient paediatric neurologist’s dilemma

doc.MUDr.Radomír Šlapal, CSc.
Ambulance dětské neurologie, Blansko

The author discusses the pitfalls of differential diagnosis between migraines, particularly those with aura, and idiopathic focal (partial)

epilepsies, particularly benign, age-related ones. These diagnoses are among the most common in the outpatient practice of a paediatric

neurologist. The author points out to the similarity of both entities in terms of medical history data, clinical presentations, and normal results

of auxiliary examinations, including structural brain imaging, and highlights the similar therapeutic strategies and prognostic aspects. EEG

remains a decisive examination tool for distinction; nevertheless, correct interpretation of findings in terms of electroclinical correlation

may not always be unequivocal. The author also emphasizes that diagnostic considerations may be greatly complicated by their concurrent

presence or mutual transitions over time in the same patient, or by possible combinations with other non-epileptic seizures, which is not

an uncommon occurrence in paediatric age. The above applies not only to clinical presentations that, particularly in the lowest age groups,

are often atypical, with children being frequently unable to describe their complaints in a relevant way, but also to EEG patterns.

Keywords: migraine, epilepsy, differential diagnosis, paediatric age

Published: July 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šlapal R. Migraine or epilepsy - an outpatient paediatric neurologist’s dilemma. Neurol. praxi. 2012;13(4):219-220.
Download citation

References

  1. Andermann F. Migraine and epilepsy: an overview. In: Andermann F, Lugaresi E (eds.). Migraine and Epilepsy. Boston: Butterwoths, 1987; 405-421.
  2. Brožová K. Význam EEG v diagnostice záchvatů a epileptických syndromů. In: Ošlejšková H, a kol. Epileptické a neepileptické záchvaty v dětství a adolescenci, Adela, 2009; 73-81.
  3. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Proposal for Revised Classification of Epilepsies and Epileptic Syndromes. Epilepsia 1989; 30: 389-399. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. DeRomanis F, Buzzi MG, Cerbo R, Feliciani M, Assenza S, Agnoli A. Migraine and epilepsy with infantile onset and electroencephalographic findigs od occipital spike-wave complexes. Headeache 1991; 31: 378-383. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Golden GS. The Alice in Wonderland syndrome in juvenile migraine. Pediatrics 1979; 63(4): 517-519. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Hadač J. Epileptické syndromy v dětském věku. In: Ošlejšková H, a kol. Epileptické a neepileptické záchvaty v dětství a adolescenci, Adela, 2009; 53-71.
  7. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia 2004; Suppl 1: 1-160.
  8. Hooking G. Special forms: variants of migraine in childhood. In: Hockaday JM (ad.). Migraine in childhood. Boston: Butterwoths, 1998; 35-53. Go to original source...
  9. Mastík M. Migréna - nová mezinárodní klasifikace a moderní léčebmé postupy. Neurol. praxi 2004; 2: 79-83.
  10. Muchová M, Ošlejšková H. Migréna v dětském věku. Neurol. praxi, 2007; 3: 163-167.
  11. Ošlejšková H. Neepileptické příhody imitující epilepsii u dětí od 3 let věku a v adolescenci. In: Ošlejšková H, a kol. Epileptické a neepileptické záchvaty v dětství a adolescenci, Adela, 2009; 175-199.
  12. Panayiotopoulos CP. Differentiating occipital epilepsies from migraine with aura, acephalgic migraine and basilar migraine. In: Panayiotopoulos CP (ed.). Benign Childhood Partial Seizures and Related Epileptic Syndromes. London: John Libbey and Company Ltd., 1999; 281-302.
  13. Paolicchi JM. The spectrum of nonepileptic events in children. Epilepsia 2002; 43(Suppl 3): 60-64. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.