Neurol. praxi. 2018;19(4):290-293 | DOI: 10.36290/neu.2019.054

Robot assisted rehabilitation in post stroke patients with upper limb paresis

MUDr. ©árka Daňková1,2, doc. MUDr. Dalibor Pastucha, Ph.D., MBA3
1 Klinika léčebné rehabilitace Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava
2 Ústav epidemiologie a ochrany veřejného zdraví, Lékařská fakulta, Ostravská univerzita, Ostrava
3 Ostravská univerzita, Lékařská fakulta, Ústav rehabilitace, Ostrava

The aim of this article is to give the insight to the field of robot assisted rehabilitation in patiens with post stroke upper limbparesis. The article provides the reader with basic classification of robotic devices and summarizes actual scientific evidence andthe perspective of their use in the future.

Keywords: stroke, hemiparesis, robot assisted rehabilitation, neuroplasticity, feedback

Received: July 9, 2019; Accepted: July 25, 2019; Prepublished online: July 25, 2019; Published: September 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Daňková ©, Pastucha D. Robot assisted rehabilitation in post stroke patients with upper limb paresis. Neurol. praxi. 2018;19(4):290-293. doi: 10.36290/neu.2019.054.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bartolo M, De Nunzio AM, Sebastiano F, Spicciato F, Tortola P, Nilsson J, Pierelli F. Arm weight support training improv es funcional motor outcome and movement smoothness after stroke. Funct Neurol 2014; Mar 5: 1. Go to original source...
    2. Buma F, Kwakkel G, Ramsey N. Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. Restorative neurology and neuroscience 2013; 31(6): 707-722. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Colomer C, Baldoví A, Torromé S, Navarro MD, Moliner B, Ferri J, Noé E. Efficacy of Armeo Spring during the chronic phase of stroke. Study in mild to moderate cases of hemiparesis. Neurologia 2013; 28(5): 261-267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Duff M, Chen Y, Cheng L, Liu SM, Blake P, Wolf SL, Rikalis T. Adaptive mixed rehabilitation improves quality of reaching movements more than traditional reaching therapy following stroke. Neurorehab neural repair 2013; 27(4): 306-315. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Feys H, Weerdt WD, Verbeke G, Steck GC, Capiau C, Kiekens C, Dejaeger E, Hoyd onck GV, Vermeersch G, Cras P. Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke:a 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial. Stroke 2004; 35(4): 924-929. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Frisoli A, Procopio C, Chisari C. Positive effects of robotic exoskeleton training of up per limb reaching movements after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012; 9(1): 36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23(5): 505-514. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Huang VS, Krakauer JW. Robotic neurorehabilitation a computational motor learning perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009; 6. 1: 5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Chan I, Fong HL, Chan KNK, Wang AQL, Cheng EKN, Chau PHY, Chow KKY, Cheung HKY. Effects of Arm Weight Support Training to promote recovery of upper limb function for subacute patients after stroke with different levels of arm impairments. Observational study. BioMed Research International 2016: 9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002; 72(4): 473-479.
    11. Laffont I, Bakhti K, Coroian F, van Dokkum L, Mottet D, Schweighofer N, Froger J. Innovative technologies applied to sensorimotor rehabilitation after stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2016; 57(8): 543-551. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014; 11: 3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Mayer M, Hluątík P. Ruka u hemiparetického pacienta. Neurofyziologie, patofyziologie, rehabilitace. Rehabilitácia (Bratislava), 2004; 41(1): 9-13. ISSN: 0375-0922.
    14. Otaka E, Otaka Y, Kasuga S, Nishimoto A, Yamazaki K, Kawakami M, Ushiba J, Liu M. Clinical usefulness and validity of robotic measur es of reaching movement in hemiparetic stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2015; 12(1): 66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Patton J, Small SL, Rymer WZ. Functional restoration for the stroke survivor: informing the efforts of engineers. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008; 15(6): 521-541. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Platz T. Evidence-based arm rehabilitation - a systematic review of the literature, Nervenarzt 2003; 74(10): 841-849. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Richards L, Hanson C, Wellborn M, Sethi A. Driving motor recovery after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008; 15(5): 397-411. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Taveggia G, Borboni A, Salvi L, Mulé C, Fogliaresi S, Villafa?e JH, Casale R. Efficacy of robot-assisted rehabilitation for the functional recovery of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled study RCT. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2016; 52(6): 767-773.Epub 2016 Jul 13. Go to PubMed...
    19. Trojan S, Pokorný J. Teoretický a klinický význam neuroplasticity. Bratisl lek Listy 1997; 12: 667-673.
    20. Vařeka I, Bednář M, Vařeková R. Robotická rehabilitace chůze. Cesk Slov Neurol Neurochir 2016; 79/112(2): 168-172.

    Return to the content


    Neurology for Practice

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.