Neurol. praxi. 2022;23(4):312-316

Ocrelizumab since the first multiple sclerosis attack - a milestone in reimbursement criteria

MUDr. Dominika Šťastná1, MUDr. Ingrid Menkyová1, 2, doc. MUDr. Dana Horáková, Ph.D.1
1 Neurologická klinika a Centrum klinických neurověd 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze
2 II. neurologická klinika LF UK a UNB, Bratislava

When intensive treatment is initiated before the inflammation behind the blood-brain barrier is closed, the potential to affect multiple sclerosis is the greatest. Thus, early initiation of high efficacy therapy appears to be the best therapeutic strategy for most patients, and thanks to the change in reimbursement criteria, this strategy can be chosen in the Czech Republic too. However, in a minority of patients with mild forms of the disease, there is no reason to take a safety risk and the appropriate choice is an escalation strategy. The choice can be made based on prognostic markers, but these are not perfect and the price for insufficiently intensive treatment is irreversible damage to nerve structures. Therefore, monitoring and re-evaluation of the strategy regarding its effectiveness and adverse effects is the key.

Keywords: multiple sclerosis, ocrelizumab, high efficacy therapy, escalation therapy, NEDA (No Evidence of Disease Activity), magnetic resonance imaging, prognostic markers, reimbursement criteria, monitoring, etiopathogenesis.

Received: May 9, 2022; Revised: May 9, 2022; Accepted: May 13, 2022; Prepublished online: May 13, 2022; Published: August 30, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šťastná D, Menkyová I, Horáková D. Ocrelizumab since the first multiple sclerosis attack - a milestone in reimbursement criteria. Neurol. praxi. 2022;23(4):312-316.
Download citation

References

  1. Ayrignac X, Le Bars E, Duflos C, et al. Serum GFAP in multiple sclerosis: correlation with disease type and MRI markers of disease severity. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10923. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Benkert P, Meier S, Schaedelin S, et al.; NfL Reference Database in the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Cohort Study Group. Serum neurofilament light chain for individual prognostication of disease activity in people with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective modelling and validation study. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(3):246-257. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bischof A, Papinutto N, Keshavan A, et al.; University of California, San Francisco MS­‑EPIC Team, Cree BAC, Hauser SL, Henry RG. Spinal Cord Atrophy Predicts Progressive Disease in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2022;91(2):268-281. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bjornevik K, Munger KL, Cortese M, et al. Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in Patients With Presymptomatic Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(1):58-64. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Brown JWL, Coles A, Horakova D, et al. Association of Initial Disease­‑Modifying Therapy With Later Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA. 2019;321(2):175-187. [Accessed 6 April 2022]. DOI 10.1001/JAMA.2018.20588. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Buron MD, Chalmer TA, Sellebjerg F, et al. Initial high­‑efficacy disease­‑modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: A nationwide cohort study. Neurology. 2020;95(8):e1041-e1051. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cree BAC, Oksenberg JR, Hauser SL. Multiple sclerosis: two decades of progress. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(3):211-214. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dekker I, Sombekke MH, Balk LJ, et al. Infratentorial and spinal cord lesions: Cumulative predictors of long­‑term disability? Mult Scler. 2020;26(11):1381-1391. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Determining the Effectiveness of earLy Intensive Versus Escalation Approaches for RRMS. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03535298, navštíveno 24. 4. 2022.
  10. Goldman MD, LaRocca NG, Rudick RA, et al.; Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium. Evaluation of multiple sclerosis disability outcome measures using pooled clinical trial data. Neurology. 2019;93(21):e1921-e1931. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Harding K, Williams O, Willis M, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Escalation vs Early Intensive Disease­‑Modifying Therapy in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(5):536-541. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Havrdova E, Arnold DL, Bar­‑Or A, et al. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) analysis by epochs in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab vs interferon beta-1a. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2018;4(1):2055217318760642. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Havrdova E, Galetta S, Hutchinson M, et al. Effect of natalizumab on clinical and radiological disease ktivity in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of the Natalizumab Safety and Efficacy in Relapsing­‑Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) study. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(3):254-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Havrdova E, Pitha J, Nytrova P, et al. Klinický doporučený postup pro diagnostiku a léčbu roztroušené sklerózy a neuromyelitis optica a onemocnění jejího širšího spektra 2020. https://www.czech­‑neuro.cz/content/uploads/2020/04/rs_odborna-2.0_final_pub_web-2.pdf, navštíveno 7. 4. 2022.
  15. He A, Merkel B, Brown JWL, et al.; MSBase study group. Timing of high­‑efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(4):307-316. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Iaffaldano P, Lucisano G, Butzkueven H, et al. Early treatment delays long­‑term disability accrual in RRMS: Results from the BMSD network. Mult Scler. 2021;27(10):1543-1555. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Lin TY, Vitkova V, Asseyer S, et al. Increased Serum Neurofilament Light and Thin Ganglion Cell­‑Inner Plexiform Layer Are Additive Risk Factors for Disease Activity in Early Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021;8(5):e1051. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Luna G, Alping P, Burman J, et al. Infection Risks Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Fingolimod, Natalizumab, Rituximab, and Injectable Therapies. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(2):184-191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Montalban X, Gold R, Thompson AJ, et al. ECTRIMS/EAN Guideline on the pharmacological treatment of people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2018;24(2):96-120. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Ocrevus SPC. https://www.sukl.cz/modules/medication/detail.php?code=0222682 & tab=prices, navštíveno 7. 4. 2022.
  21. Pandit L. No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) in Multiple Sclerosis - Shifting the Goal Posts. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2019;22(3):261-263. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Prosperini L, Mancinelli CR, Solaro CM, et al. Induction Versus Escalation in Multiple Sclerosis: A 10-Year Real World Study. Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17(3):994-1004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Rotstein D, Montalban X. Reaching an evidence­‑based prognosis for personalized treatment of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(5):287-300. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0170-8. PMID: 30940920. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Simonsen CS, Flemmen HØ, Broch L, et al. Early High Efficacy Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Is the Best Predictor of Future Disease Activity Over 1 and 2 Years in a Norwegian Population­‑Based Registry. Front Neurol. 2021;12:693017. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Spelman T, Magyari M, Piehl F, et al. Treatment Escalation vs Immediate Initiation of Highly Effective Treatment for Patients With Relapsing­‑Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Data From 2 Different National Strategies. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(10):1197-1204. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Stankiewicz JM, Weiner HL. An argument for broad use of high efficacy treatments in early multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2019;7(1):e636. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Stastna D, Menkyova I, Drahota J, et al. Multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and COVID-19: A pandemic year in Czechia. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;54:103104. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Traboulsee A, Simon JH, Stone L, et al. Revised Recommendations of the Consortium of MS Centers Task Force for a Standardized MRI Protocol and Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Follow­‑Up of Multiple Sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(3):394-401. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Traditional Versus Early Aggressive Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis Trial. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03500328, navštíveno 24. 4. 2022.
  30. Uher T, Krasensky J, Malpas C, et al. Evolution of Brain Volume Loss Rates in Early Stages of Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021;8(3):e979. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.