Neurol. praxi. 2022;23(5):413-416 | DOI: 10.36290/neu.2021.016

Examination of subjective visual vertical by SVV bucket test

MUDr. Jan Heřman1, MUDr. Tomáš Fürst2, prof. MUDr. Richard Salzman, Ph.D.1
1 Klinika otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie hlavy a krku, Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc
2 Katedra matematické analýzy a aplikací matematiky, Přírodovědecká fakulta Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci

Objectives: To determine the tilt of subjective visual vertical (SVV) in healthy volunteers and in patients with peripheral vestibular syndrome by SVV bucket test. Evaluate the interindividual repeatability of the examination in patients of otoneurological clinic.

Methodology: The results of SVV bucket test of 38 healthy volunteers and 42 patients with peripheral vestibulopathy were compared. We evaluated the interrater variability of the method by comparing the results of measurements of a doctor and a nurse in 153 patients of otoneurological clinic.

Results: The average SVV in healthy volunteers was mostly less than 1°, not more than 2°. Significantly greater tilt of subjective visual verticals was observed in patients with peripheral vestibular lesion (p < 0.001). The tilt decreased over time. We found a good interindividual reproducibility of the examination.

Conclusion: Examination of subjective visual vertical by the SVV bucket method is inexpensive, fast and repeatable. In healthy subjects, the tilt of SVV does not exceed 2°. It is higher in most patients with acute unilateral vestibulopathy, shows the side of the lesion, and decreases over time.

Keywords: subjective visual vertical, SVV bucket test, peripheral vestibulopathy.

Received: December 12, 2020; Revised: February 19, 2021; Accepted: March 22, 2021; Prepublished online: March 22, 2021; Published: October 6, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Heřman J, Fürst T, Salzman R. Examination of subjective visual vertical by SVV bucket test. Neurol. praxi. 2022;23(5):413-416. doi: 10.36290/neu.2021.016.
Download citation

References

  1. Chetana N, Avesh R. Subjective visual vertical in variol vestibular disorders by using a simple bucket test. Indian Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;67(2):180-184. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Černý R, Čakrt O, Jeřábek J. Laboratorní metody vyšetření vestibulárního aparátu. Neurol. praxi. 2017;18(3):163-169. Go to original source...
  3. How to construct an SVV bucket, University of Pittsburgh http://www.mvrc.pitt.edu/files/svv-bucket-how-to.pdf (návod na výrobu kbelíku).
  4. Jeong SH, Kim HJ, Kim JS: Vestibular neuritis. Semin Neurol. 2013;33(3):185-194. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kattah JC, Talkad AV, Wang DZ, et al. HINTS to diagnose stroke in the acute vestibular syndrome: three-step bedside oculomotor examination more sensitive than early MRI diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke. 2009;40(11):3504-3510. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Radvanská E. Subjektivní percepce zrakové vertikály. Praha, 2018. Bakalářská práce. Univerzita Karlova, 2. lékařská fakulta, Klinika rehabilitace a tělovýchovného lékařství. Vedoucí práce Čakrt, Ondřej.
  7. Zwergal A, Rettinger N, Frenzel C, et al. A bucket of static vestibular function. Neurology. 2009;72:1689-1692. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.