Neurol. praxi. 2023;24(1):26-30 | DOI: 10.36290/neu.2022.053

Surgical treatment of the secondary lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrative review)

MUDr. Pavel Barsa, Ph.D.
Neurochirurgické oddělení, Neurocentrum, Krajská nemocnice Liberec, a. s., Liberec
Neurochirurgická a neuroonkologické klinika, 1. LF UK a Ústřední vojenské nemocnice Praha

Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis may experience symptoms such as back pain, nerve root irritation and neurogenic claudication. Although studies have shown that differences between non-surgical and surgical treatments are not significant, positive effects such as early pain relief, associated functional improvement and higher quality of life, may be expected after surgery in patients with severe lumbar stenosis. Surgical treatment consists of decompression of nerve structures. Additional stabilization is considered depending on the degree of decompression and accompanying instability. Recently introduced techniques of minimally invasive surgery bring promising surgical results and their further development can be expected in the near future. Thus, even better therapeutic effects may be expected with an approach aimed at understanding the pathophysiology, taking into account morphology and knowledge of predictors of treatment methods for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Keywords: lumbar spine, secondary stenosis, surgical treatment, decompression, surgical stabilization.

Received: June 15, 2022; Revised: August 28, 2022; Accepted: August 28, 2022; Prepublished online: August 28, 2022; Published: March 3, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Barsa P. Surgical treatment of the secondary lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrative review). Neurol. praxi. 2023;24(1):26-30. doi: 10.36290/neu.2022.053.
Download citation

References

  1. Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L, et al. Outcomes and their predictors in lumbar spinal stenosis: a 12-year follow­‑up. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(2):369-80. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3411-y. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Aryanpur J, Ducker T. Multilevel lumbar laminotomies for focal spinal stenosis: case report. Neurosurgery. 1988;23(1):111-5. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198807000-00021. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Deyo RA, Martin BI, Ching A, et al. Interspinous spacers compared with decompression or fusion for lumbar stenosis: complications and repeat operations in the medicare population. Spine. 2013;38:865-872. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828631b8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Gibson JN, Waddell G. Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane Review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 200515;30(20):2312-20. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182315.88558.9c Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Hurri H, Slätis P, Soini J, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of long­‑term outcome 12 years after operative and conservative treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11(2):110-5. Go to original source...
  6. Jansson KA, Blomqvist P, Granath F, Németh G. Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987-1999. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(5):535-41. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0544-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Lurie J, Tomkins­‑Lane C. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ. 2016;352:h6234. doi:10.1136/bmj.h6234. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Lew RA, et al. Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(10):1123-31. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199705150-00012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Kovacs FM, Urrutia G, Alarcon JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine. 2011;36(20):E1335-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820c97b1. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Machado GC, Ferreira PH, Harris IA, et al. Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta­‑analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0122800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122800. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Micankova Adamova B, Vohanka S, et al. Prediction of long­‑term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(12):2611-2619. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2424-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Min JH, Jang JS, Lee SH. Clinical significance of redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina in lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2008;110:14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2007. 08. 005. Go to original source...
  13. Nechanicka N, Barsa P, Harsa P. Psychosocial factors in patients indicated for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2016;77(5):432-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1583179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Pearson A, Lurie J, Tosteson T, et al. Who should have surgery for spinal stenosis? Treatment effect predictors in SPORT. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(21):1791-1802. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182634b04. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine. 2010;35(21):1919-1924. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Simotas AC, Dorey FJ, Hansraj KK, et al. Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and outcome results and a 3year survivorship analysis. Spine. 2000;25(2):197-203. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200001150-00009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Spetzger U, Bertalanffy H, Reinges MHT, et al. Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: Clinical experiences. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139:397-403. doi: 10.1007/BF01808874. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Stromqvist F, Jonsson B, Stromqvist B. Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons. Dural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcome. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:825-828. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2101-2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Suzuki K, Ishida Y, Ohmori K, et al. Redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina: clinical aspects and consideration of pathogenesis. Neurosurgery. 1989;24:521-8. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198904000-00006. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:794-810. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa0707136. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Yang SM, Park HK, Cho SJ, et al. Redundant nerve roots of cauda equina mimicking intradural disc herniation: a case report. Korean J Spine. 2013;10:41-43. doi:10.14245/kjs.2013. 10. 1. 41. Go to original source...




Neurology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.